Logic Omission

Logic tries to organise how true propositions can associate to make other true propositions.

Some other part of research, especially philosophy of knowledge, tries to identify what makes a proposition true.

On this theme, most of the philosopher have studied science. In the field of economics and management, a lot exemple are nevertheless available, and much more understandable.

• First of all, gathering some material is a necessity: finding exemples of argumentations, of decisions, of critics: Logic Material
• Then, study this material with a few directions in mind:
  1. How someone who has no idea on a situation, can built some knowledge (against silence)?
  2. What is the heart of a description?
  3. How a description can come to a solution? This is about the essence of audit. How an audit saying that it doesn't work, can come up with a total different solution to use what already exist?
  4. Study what the critics are against a position. On this matter, one has to face that arguments most of the time deals either with method problems, or with omission of a side of a problem.

If logic still understand semantic as just being true, and the philosophy of knowledge, just stick to justification, we will have to find a way of understanding what thinking is, in relation to something dealing more with the structure of language: use the language network to build the concept of omission.

Categories: Philogic | Blog | Philogic Blog