Philogic Blog blogentry 131103 1
From Fxp Wiki
Relation au regard Relation to sight
"Let's take, in another way, the relation to sight.
This is war. I go through the plain, and I suppose myself under a sight
watching me. If I suppose it, it's not because I fear a manifestation of my
ennemi, an attack, because in this case, as soon it happens, the situation
cools down, and I know who I'm dealing with. What really matters to me, is
to know what the other imagine, what he finds out about my intentions, of
me, walking on, because I have to hide my mouvements. It's about crafty
(cunning).
The main thing is not that the other sees where I am, it 's that he sees
where I go, which is precisely, where I am not. What structures the relation
is what is not there."
How to analyse such a text. How to express logicaly the way the author
brings the focus from one point to another. How to explicit the reversing
and the links between the two formulas: where I am, where I am not.
Pas encore traduit.
